You don’t have to know much French to know that that’s not French. ![]() It is, at best, a string of uninflected French words shoe-horned into a pattern of English syntax. The thing is Bill Wyman probably knew that, too.Įnough to make any true speaker of French squirm. So why did he mangle it so badly in this song? As the recipient of a decent post-War British education, he almost certainly knew some French. Unfortunately, I knew the answer as soon as I heard the song. A lot of my classmates wanted nothing to do with “that Froggy stuff” (though they weren’t always as polite as that about it).Ĭompulsory French lessons in Northern England in the 1970s were far from the most popular item in the curriculum. Frog-leg eating, onion-selling, garlic-stinking foes for more than a millennium were, it seemed, the perfect foil for forging a British identity. Vmware quickboot flag metadata vib check Airbeam gymnastics Psilocybin spore syringe Google drive app for mac Tiled showers ideas Lol quickcast or not Temple run 2 game play free. “Froggies At It Again,” screamed the newspaper headlines at the slightest contretemps over the Channel. Studying to be a language teacher, I heard about the “ Critical Period Hypothesis,” saying basically that if you don’t learn a language before puberty, you will never learn it properly. ![]() ![]() The consensus at the time was that, though it may not be true about language learning in general, it certainly seemed to apply to pronunciation: it is pretty rare for adult foreign language learners to develop native-like pronunciation (whatever that is! See Skye’s and Donna’s articles in this Think Tank). It didn’t take me long to develop a personal hypothesis that this was, at least in part, because of psychological resistance to the threat to identity posed by a foreign language.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |